IIS 6 (RSS)

IIS 6

Unsafe LAMP? Open Source LAMP software more bugs than Microsoft's stack

After:

IIS6 has less bugs than Apache
SQL Server is more secure than MYSQL
ASP.NET is more secure than PHP

now this at http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/index.php?p=103

On the linux vs Windows front it's pretty much even without browsers I guess, with Firefox installed a LAMP box is definitely not a safe boat

 

 

 

Windows 2003 + IIS6 reliability in a hosting environment

from http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/09/04/datapipe_rackspace_and_tiscali_most_reliable_hosters_in_august_2005.html.

"Datapipe, a managed hosting provider in Hoboken, N.J., has been the best performer twice in 2005, and was the most reliable hosting company for the second half of 2004. The Datapipe web site, which is hosted on Windows Server 2003, has not had a measurable outage since Necraft began public reporting of monthly uptime performance in June 2003."

Apache + ASP.NET

ASP.NET + Apache 

first check out IIS6 (see why IIS6 is a better choice to run ASP.NET than apache here and here)

 

Run ASP.NET on Apache: 

XSP

mod_mono

mod_aspdotnet

Cassini (Cassini on Apache)

CassiniEx (enhanced)

see also http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/kris/archive/2004/06/25/17578.aspx on running apache + asp.net

 

Apache (Foundation) vs .NET(ASP.NET): Final smackdown

I've had a loook at the Apache website and found their incubator program quite intriguing.


I'm quite fond of open source as a means of collaboration, fellow developers cameraderie, (academic) research and
covering overlooked niches, but not as a a political/ideological means to harm commercial companies or anticapitalism.

Cleared that up, Apache foundation comprises a whole range of technologies battling .NET or MS products.
There are groups working on Apache, the webserver, PHP ,Phyton and ultimately Java in the Jakarta project.
Apart from these majors, there are several hundreds of subprojects, including most of the leading open source frameworks
for building and testing software(Junit, Ant. Log4J etc etc). Even .NET is represented with Log4Net.

As a coalition Apache has lots of credibility, good software and the support of all ABM vendors and users.

Now, as an evangelist of MS technology - despite my regular rants - I see Apache as a formidable nemesis for
MS, but also view Apache with some envy as there is nothing comparable in the .NET world.

It would make a wise business decision for MS to clone the setup. The pros would be able to create an independent conglomerate of the top 20 openly available projects like Ghengis, OpenCF,DNN ,.Text add some of the MS magic like the Application Blocks, Project Niobe and mix with INETA, MVPs and the other technology stalwarts of the MS influence sphere.  

Scoble?

links:

http://weblogs.asp.net/sandyk/archive/2004/03/02/82914.aspx
http://weblogs.asp.net/rjacobs/archive/2004/02/09/70355.aspx
http://weblogs.asp.net/rosherove/archive/2004/02/10/70706.aspx
http://weblogs.asp.net/markcli/archive/2004/01/12/58041.aspx
http://weblogs.asp.net/jezell/archive/2004/02/10/70828.aspx
http://weblogs.asp.net/jledgard/archive/2004/03/03/83645.aspx