<feed version="0.3" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xml:lang="en-GB"><title>laurencetimms.blog.blog.blog</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/default.aspx" /><tagline type="text/html" /><id>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/default.aspx</id><author><url>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/default.aspx</url></author><generator url="http://communityserver.org" version="1.0.1.50214">Community Server</generator><modified>2004-10-20T07:39:00Z</modified><entry><title>I'm over here</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2008/05/19/469615.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:469615</id><created>2008-05-19T04:09:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">This particular blog has been dark for some time. I'm active elsewhere now: follow me on &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/laurencetimms"&gt;twitter&lt;/a&gt; or read more on my &lt;a href="http://laurencetimms.tumblr.com"&gt;tumblr account&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=469615" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=469615</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>BizTalk can't see your schema? Is it deployed? Is it really really deployed? Are you sure?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2005/10/19/133298.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:133298</id><created>2005-10-18T20:30:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;This is a public service message for any tyro BizTalk developers (like us) who are getting a HAT message along the lines of &lt;EM&gt;Loading document specification [some schema] from assembly [some assembly] failed. Verify that the schema is deployed properly and that the schema assembly implements the document spec.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Scenario&lt;/STRONG&gt;: You've got a nice remote BizTalk host server installed and running. You're developing BizTalk projects locally on your PC in Visual Studio 2003. You're using VS2003 to deploy those projects to that remote server. The project builds fine. The project deploys fine. The receive ports and send ports are all fine and dandy. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You drop a test message into a receive port. It disappears into the messagebox. You go and wait by the send port with bated breath. Nothing appears. You wait a little longer. The absence of messages frustratingly persists. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Finally you accept that something might have gone wrong, so you open the HAT. You check out the Messages Received in Past Day. There it is: 'Unparsed Interchange'. You open the message flow and you see that BizTalk in all defiance of common sense and decency has been unable to find a schema to match your message.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BizTalk is obviously wrong, because you strong named your assembly and deployed it. You even made sure that the destination BizTalk server was correctly set in the project properties. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let me interject at this point. It's more than possible that your carefully crafted schema made it to the remote server, but simply didn't get into the remote GAC. You see, the Deploy functionality in &lt;STRONG&gt;Visual Studio 2003 can't do a remote GAC install&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Instead it helpfully installs the assembly in your local GAC, right where you don't really need it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So BizTalk wasn't lying after all. It can't understand your message because the schema isn't in the GAC. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The solution? To get the BizTalk assembly (and any non-BizTalk dependency assemblies for that matter) into the GAC on the BizTalk server, you need to run gacutil.exe, btsdeploy.exe or the BizTalk Deployment Wizard locally on the server. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's all in the documentation, apparently. Here are some helpful links:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/deploying/htm/ebiz_asdepl_concepts_grbe.asp"&gt;How Assembly Deployment Works&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/luke/articles/365678.aspx"&gt;BizTalk Power Toys.&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;You need these.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.gotdotnet.com/Workspaces/Workspace.aspx?id=62d94220-c0e0-46d4-a2d6-85d3d911467a"&gt;A BizTalk Auto Deploy project at GotDotNet&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Tags: &lt;A href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/biztalk"&gt;biztalk&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/deploy"&gt;deploy&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/deployment"&gt;deployment&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/GAC"&gt;GAC&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=133298" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=133298</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>over here</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2005/01/13/43992.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:43992</id><created>2005-01-13T12:19:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;Notwithstanding the fact that this blog is almost a wraith-like version of its former self, and largely resident in the same shadowland occupied by OS/2 Warp and Lotus Notes, you may like to know that I am posting &lt;A href="http://www.laurencetimms.com/blog.html"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All very interesting stuff, almost none of it anything to do with .net.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=43992" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=43992</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Detecting Zero Length Files in an Application Center cluster pair</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/11/24/33423.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:33423</id><created>2004-11-24T13:10:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;Our website runs on a pair of colo-ed web servers that get syncronised together by Application Center. Let's call the servers Andy and Betty (names have been changed to protect the innocent). Both sit behind a server iron that does load balancing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Website updates get published to Andy via an automatic FTP service. That works fine, although it can be a little sluggish.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After the files appear on Andy, Application Center pops up and says 'Hey, time to copy some files and permissions over to Betty!'. And lo, the files are copied and Betty looks the same as Andy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, we have noticed recently that Betty has not been looking the same as Andy. Specifically, a number of zero-byte files have appeared on Betty, where their equivalent back on Andy are perfectly okay. Mostly these are GIFs and PDFs, but we have had a few important pages get zeroed out.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately there's no evidence in the logs about why this is happening. It's not consistent, and we have not been able to replicate it. At the moment we're just letting the world see Andy, and Betty is invisible to the public. Andy is man enough for the job but we'd really like them both to work in partnership.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;While we try to work out what's going on (with help from Microsoft), I've written a Windows service app that detects zero-length files. It monitors the file system and if any files become zero-length and stay that way for more than a few minutes, the administrators are alerted. It's a simple little app; if anyone wants to see it or have a copy, they're more than welcome. It's in C#.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If anyone can shed any light on our little problemette described above, we'll be very grateful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=33423" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=33423</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>EA: Disgusting Behaviour</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/11/12/31826.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:31826</id><created>2004-11-12T07:53:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;I've been on one or two 'death march' projects during my years in IT. Each time I just buckled down and got on with it, and came out the other side saying "never again"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But no project I have ever worked on, no company I have ever worked for (even Razorfish, bless their little cotton socks) has ever treated me so badly as EA appears to treat its staff.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please read &lt;A href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/ea_spouse/"&gt;this article&lt;/A&gt; by ea_spouse on livejournal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=31826" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=31826</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>msn search beta - working now</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/11/12/31809.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:31809</id><created>2004-11-12T06:23:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;Ok, the &lt;A href="http://beta.search.msn.com"&gt;new msn search&lt;/A&gt; is working okay this morning. I haven't noticed any US bloggers commenting on it being unavailable yesterday, so perhaps it got working again by the time they hit the office.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's running fast and looking fine. I ran a couple of search terms that I run on Google from time to time, and got a longer set of results. Also ordered slightly differently. Better results? Too early to say.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The tuning feature looks interesting: hit Search Builder|Results ranking - you can prioritise/deprioritise the accuracy of the match, the popularity of the results and the freshness of the results. I can imagine that this would be useful when struggling with large result sets. We'll see.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps it's time for a sea change on my desktop - a move from IE + Google to Firefox + MSN Search. Yes, I know it's a weird mix, but then I've never cared about the whole MS is good/MS is bad thing. I just like products that &lt;EM&gt;work&lt;/EM&gt;. Strange, eh?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=31809" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=31809</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>msn search beta - a poor start?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/11/11/31664.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:31664</id><created>2004-11-11T11:19:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;Microsoft launched a beta of the new MSN search today. Almost quivering with anticipation, I headed over to &lt;A href="http://beta.search.msn.com"&gt;http://beta.search.msn.com&lt;/A&gt; to try it out.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It barfed. Repeatedly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For the last hour (13:00 to 14:00 GMT) the site has been returning "This site is temporarily unavailable, please check back soon."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not a great way to start. I appreciate that the launch team are probably all at home tucked up in bed after pulling some very late nights, but you've got to &lt;STRONG&gt;care&lt;/STRONG&gt; about how new products are perceived outside the US, as well as inside.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The msnsearch team have also launched a &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/msnsearch/"&gt;blog&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;which suggests that the service is '&lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/msnsearch/archive/2004/11/11/255560.aspx"&gt;now available&lt;/A&gt;'. This is an interpretation of 'available' which I have not come across previously.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will be 'checking back', but probably tomorrow.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Edit: &lt;A href="http://weblogs.asp.net/wim/archive/2004/11/11/255641.aspx"&gt;Wim&lt;/A&gt; is also experiencing problems, but he got further than me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=31664" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=31664</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Generating RSS feeds from code: Trackword Game update</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/11/10/31545.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:31545</id><created>2004-11-10T10:38:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;I've taken my little &lt;A href="http://laurencetimms.com/trackwordhome.aspx"&gt;Trackword&lt;/A&gt; game a step further. I've implemented a &lt;A href="http://www.laurencetimms.com/dailytrackword.aspx"&gt;Daily Trackword page&lt;/A&gt; which selects a random trackword for the first visitor of the day, and then retains the trackword and the grid ordering for all future visitors that day. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The next step for that page is to build in stats, so players can see how well each other has done - ie who the found the Trackword quickest, who has found the most other words in the grid. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The main reason for the Daily Trackword page was to build an RSS feed containing the Daily Trackword game. That's also live now, at &lt;A href="http://www.laurencetimms.com/rss.aspx"&gt;http://www.laurencetimms.com/rss.aspx&lt;/A&gt;. The feed shows the five most recent daily games. You can choose to play the Trackword just from the feed (using only the power of your mind, or maybe pen and paper), or click the link to open the relevant Daily Trackword page.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I realise that the dateline on the Daily Trackword feed &amp;amp; page is coming out in German! My host space is in Germany, and I haven't specified the culture for the date formatting. One of those things you never expect to have to do...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Main discovery: the RSS schema is really simple and obvious. Populating it with some interesting content is harder!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For this RSS feed I pull the Daily Trackword records from the database and assemble them into a DataTable object which is formatted according to the RSS 2.0 spec. I then bind the DataTable to an ASP.NET Repeater control and use DataBinder.Eval to pull the table values out into the Repeater contents. It's an elaboration on the approach described by Scott Mitchell&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnaspp/html/aspnet-createrssw-aspnet.asp"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's all a bit rough and ready, plenty of scope for refinement!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I wonder if this is the first RSS 'game'? I'm sure it's not. Maybe I'm early to the party though; that's good enough for me&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=31545" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=31545</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>My .NET word game is online now</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/11/01/30613.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:30613</id><created>2004-11-01T13:06:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;Finally my little Trackword game has found a host. Check out &lt;A href="http://www.laurencetimms.com/trackwordhome.aspx"&gt;http://www.laurencetimms.com/trackwordhome.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;IMG src="/WebLog/images/dotnetjunkies_com/laurencetimms/1020/r_tw.gif"&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;It looks very v1.0 at the moment, but I have big plans including:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;RSS feed (daily game in an RSS feed, including the answers for the prevous day; user can play the game from the visual content in the feed or can follow the link to the actual page to play the daily game with the full UI)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;scoring&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;foreign language versions (German first)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;save game option&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;hi scores table&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;4x4 grid for people with way too much time to play word games&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;make the damn thing look prettier&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30613" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=30613</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Testing on an industrial scale at Microsoft</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/10/29/30372.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:30372</id><created>2004-10-29T10:08:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;Scott Guthrie follows up his excellent blog entry about testing ASP.NET 2.0 with a &lt;A href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2004/10/28/249458.aspx"&gt;lot more detail&lt;/A&gt; about the testing software, scripts, hardware and all that good stuff.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;These people do testing on an industrial scale. Just check out the lab photo!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30372" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=30372</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Whidbey Update from ScottGu</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/10/25/29592.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:29592</id><created>2004-10-25T06:14:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;After a long silence - what &lt;EM&gt;has&lt;/EM&gt; the guy been doing recently - &lt;A href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/"&gt;Scott Guthrie&lt;/A&gt; has posted a great &lt;A href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2004/10/23/246709.aspx"&gt;Whidbey/ASP.NET 2.0/Visual Web Developer update&lt;/A&gt; which gives an excellent insight into the behaviour of a large development team approaching a major milestone. In this case the milestone is Beta2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check it out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29592" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29592</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Today's Trackword</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/10/22/29409.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:29409</id><created>2004-10-22T10:28:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;How many words of three letters or more can you find by tracking from one square to the next, going up, down, sideways or diagonally in order? You may not go through the same letter square again in any word. No proper nouns or foreign words. What's the hidden nine-letter word?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;TABLE id=Table1 style="TOP: 130px; HEIGHT: 124px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=1 width=129 border=1&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD style="WIDTH: 29px; HEIGHT: 40px" vAlign=center align=middle&gt;&lt;SPAN id=tl style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: large; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;P&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD style="WIDTH: 29px; HEIGHT: 40px" vAlign=center align=middle&gt;&lt;SPAN id=tm style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: large; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;E&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD style="WIDTH: 29px; HEIGHT: 40px" vAlign=center align=middle&gt;&lt;SPAN id=tr style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: large; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;R&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD style="WIDTH: 29px; HEIGHT: 40px" vAlign=center align=middle&gt;&lt;SPAN id=ml style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: large; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;M&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD style="WIDTH: 29px; HEIGHT: 40px" vAlign=center align=middle&gt;&lt;SPAN id=mm style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: large; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;A&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD style="WIDTH: 29px; HEIGHT: 40px" vAlign=center align=middle&gt;&lt;SPAN id=mr style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: large; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;I&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD style="WIDTH: 29px; HEIGHT: 40px" vAlign=center align=middle&gt;&lt;SPAN id=bl style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: large; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;P&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD style="WIDTH: 29px; HEIGHT: 40px" vAlign=center align=middle&gt;&lt;SPAN id=bm style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: large; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;G&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD style="WIDTH: 29px; HEIGHT: 40px" vAlign=center align=middle&gt;&lt;SPAN id=br style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: large; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;N&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Trackword is a game written in C#, using a component architecture which means it's fairly easy to render it to HTML or to Winforms. It uses a SQL Server-based dictionary. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The core game component also has functions for finding all the possible words in the grid. That was fun to code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm happy to share the code with anyone who is interested - constructive criticism is always welcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29409" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29409</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>What file extension are you?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/10/22/29395.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:29395</id><created>2004-10-22T06:47:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;I'm stunned. But this is what it said, so it must be true.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.bbspot.com/News/2004/10/extension_quiz.php"&gt;&lt;IMG height=90 alt="You are .c You have potential, but are often the source of problems and frustration.  One misplaced word and you get stuck in an infinite loop." src="http://www.bbspot.com/Images/News_Features/2004/10/file_extensions/c.jpg" width=300 border=0&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Which File Extension are You?&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29395" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29395</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>VS2005 Delay Rumour FUD</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/10/20/29182.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:29182</id><created>2004-10-20T11:45:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;Paul Ballard on TheServerSide.net says &lt;A href="http://www.theserverside.net/news/thread.tss?thread_id=29537"&gt;SQL Server 2005 Delayed&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The implication is that VS2005 will also be delayed because of the close relationship between Yukon and Whidbey.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Frans Bouma is &lt;A href="http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma/archive/2004/10/19/244654.aspx"&gt;upset about this&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Fabrice claims that everything he needs out of Whidbey has been &lt;A href="http://weblogs.asp.net/fmarguerie/archive/2004/10/20/244958.aspx"&gt;ready for months &lt;/A&gt;and why should he wait for some pissy new database? (ok, I implied the last bit)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Robert McLaws &lt;A href="http://weblogs.asp.net/rmclaws/archive/2004/10/20/244998.aspx"&gt;reiterates dependency issues&lt;/A&gt; (Yukon, .NET 2.0, Whidbey) and says nothing has really changed since Whidbey was always going to be May-July.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In &lt;A href="http://weblogs.asp.net/rmclaws/archive/2004/10/20/244998.aspx#245011"&gt;comments&lt;/A&gt; it boils down to a likely scenario of VS2005 being released 3-8 weeks before SQL2005 but probably being available for download from MSDN for some time before.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hands up everyone who's going to start cutting live code with the VS2005 Beta.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29182" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29182</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>What kind of social software are you?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/archive/2004/10/20/29152.aspx" /><id>58df7014-fd75-437c-9641-150997716d1c:29152</id><created>2004-10-20T07:39:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;P&gt;I am &lt;A href="http://undergroundlondon.com/social/ss_ican.html"&gt;iCan&lt;/A&gt;. Which is &lt;A href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/ican/"&gt;this&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;- interesting!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://undergroundlondon.com/social/index.html"&gt;What are you?&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29152" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/laurencetimms/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29152</wfw:commentRss></entry></feed>